Tuesday, March 22, 2016

第三次世界大戰的開始?

第三次世界大戰的開始?雖然聽起來很荒妙,不過也許真的在慢慢地開始了。因為每個國家都在得罪別的國家;和平相處這東西,現在只是個表面功夫而已。
今天在比利時的爆炸案件,雖然還沒定案不過八九不離十是與伊斯蘭恐怖份子有關聯。這應該會導致北洋公約組織的國家成員直接介入中東的IS危機。可是想剷除IS真的那麼容易嗎?個人看法是IS若在中東被打敗,他們附屬在其他國家的潛伏兵團會慢慢地重新建立起來再做一次的對抗。所以想完全剷除IS,恐怕是個不可能的任務。(北洋公約組織-NATO,比利時、法國、美國、土耳其等國家都是成員)
再來談一下北韓。他們最近除了在做核武測試,也在南韓附近的海域發射了短距離飛彈,算是個挑釁動作。這導致了聯合國做出了最嚴重的制裁決定,連俄羅斯跟中國都贊成了。可是北韓沒在怕,想說是不是他們有足夠的軍力來征服南韓了?說到了南韓,因為北韓的核武測試,他們有在打算跟美國購買末端高空防禦體系統(THAAD)來保護區域安全。不過這個決定引起了隔壁的中國和俄羅斯的抗議,因為若THAAD真的在南韓執行,南韓跟美國都可以藉由系統的雷達監控系統來探測中國和俄羅斯的土地。
THAAD系統的飛彈是已動能將導彈摧毀。可是人心不可測,若飛彈的彈頭裡已核武或別的彈頭來取代,那THAAD系統會從防禦系統變成攻擊用具。想一想,如果他們的飛彈有本事在大氣層外摧毀導彈,那如果要設定成長距離的攻擊飛彈也不是件很難的事。難怪中國跟俄羅斯都在怕怕的。(這THAAD變成攻擊用具純粹是我無憑無據的推測)
台灣有沒有面臨捲入第三次世界大戰的可能呢?之前好玩地跟朋友們做一下兵推,發現台灣說不定是引起世界大戰的原因。不過都是純粹的開玩笑,而且想一想應該不可能會發生。

Saturday, January 30, 2016

有關種族歧視

  澳洲之旅讓我想到了有關歧視這個問題。澳洲人其實是熱情而且好心的,可是還是有小部分的澳洲人對亞洲人有歧視的傾向。我走在街上,無緣無故會有人用很不屑的語氣說:“Yeah, Yeah, Enjoy Your Time Here(好好在這裡享受吧)” 。從語氣聽來真的對亞洲人(尤其華人)有些不歡迎,我就想了一下,到底為什麼呢?

種族歧視
  種族歧視最簡單的定義就是針對某種族群,而不是個人品質,有不同的對待(而且是不好
的對待)。以上面的例子就是我在澳洲沒幹甚麼壞事,結果還是有人因為我的膚色和長相是亞洲人所以就有路人起偏見。換句話說,也許之前有些亞洲人在澳洲幹了壞事,結果無辜的旅客也遭到偏見對待了。不過到底是真的嗎?

為什麼亞洲人在澳洲被歧視?
  其實澳洲人真的不喜歡亞洲人嗎?其實只有小部分的人是這樣,不是每個人。不過,亞洲人在澳洲的卻幹了不少的壞事(不算壞,而是不符合當地文化的事情,或是造成他們生活不便的事情)。比如說,有錢的中國人在澳洲買房子(而且是很多中國人買很多房子)把屋價炒高,害了很多澳洲的中低階收入人士買不到房子。再來一個吧,中國旅客(不是故意刁難中國人,而是因為這是真實)在澳洲狂買奶粉帶回中國以高價轉售回中國,搞得澳洲奶粉缺貨,當地居民想購買也困難。欸,這種事情好像見過吧,中國人大量買尿布轉售回中國(我忘了是在哪一個國家),搞得尿布缺貨,讓當地的居民產生對中國人的討厭。難道中國那麼缺嬰兒需用品需要到國外進貨嗎?這我就真的不多說。也許澳洲的產品的卻比較好所以才有人肯出高價收購,導致這種瘋狂的事情發生。

歧視有對有錯嗎?
  歧視會產生的原因大部分是因為不夠了解對方的文化習俗而產生的。此外,我覺得最大的原因是不尊重。分析一下以上的案例,中國人因為自己的利益,在別的國家大量購買嬰兒用品然後回國高價轉售,讓當地的居民生活不方便,還賺取暴利。就是因為中國人不尊重當地的文化習俗跟人,所以才會被歧視。結果,因為某一些中國人的自私,搞得每個看起來像中國人的都被討厭、受歧視。這就是以種族或膚色來歸類路上看到的人物。也就是說,今天我不是中國人,只要看起來像中國人,一些澳洲人就會有偏見。當然,看到一個不等於全部,所以這種歸類,是真的不妥當。所以錯的話,是錯在兩邊,不過遭受歧視的一定要自我反省。不要貪圖利益,害了只要是長相相似的都被討厭。澳洲只差還沒發生種族之間的大衝突,比美國好很多,所以任何人都可以在澳洲很安全地旅行。(順便來個小玩笑,至少這些中國人在澳洲投資了不少,對澳洲的經濟有一點點的幫助)

結語
  其實看了不少的種族歧視案子(尤其是美國的),覺得還是因為個人的行為導致整個種族受到偏見、被討厭。所以透過尊重、體諒、還有互相瞭解各自的文化,避免衝突,種族歧視才不會阿省。

Monday, January 18, 2016

How a 16-Year-Old Changed the Political Landscape of Taiwan? Description and opinions on Chou Tzu-Yu's incident.

  This is a brief description of a young 16-year-old who had influenced Taiwan’s election in just one night. Chou Tzu-Yu became an overnight sensation in Taiwan and all over the world after she was forced to apologize for an action, which is now known as Chou Tzu-Yu’s incident.

Who is Chou Tzu-Yu?

  Chou Tzu-Yu (周子瑜) a Taiwan born 16-year-old was scouted into JYP at an age of 14 and was further trained in South Korea before finally placed under a rookie group, TWICE. Her beauty and talent had captured the heart of many South Koreans, wanting her to be part of a girls group, in which she did in the end after some elimination scouting rounds in South Korea. Tzu-Yu had made headlines in Taiwan and South Korea after TWICE released their first mini-album in October 2015. She is the pride of Taiwan she is the first local born and raised Taiwanese who entered a South Korea girl group, which provided it is successful, will be famous in all over the world.

  TWICE consisted of five South Koreans, four Japanese, and of Tzu-Yu, a Taiwanese. In a promotional video of TWICE, the members were seen to hold the flag of their nationality, and Tzu-Yu had chosen to hold the flag of Republic of China (R.O.C., Taiwan). This action means a lot to Taiwanese as it is a very rare occasion where R.O.C.’s flag is waved outside of Taiwan and for the first time in a South Korean girl group. The nationalism among Taiwanese had rose, especially among youths. They were proud of Tzu-Yu as a Taiwan’s icon rising in an international stage. However, this had caused dissents in China, as PRC still does not recognize Taiwan as an independent nation, and they had the authority over Taiwan and R.O.C.’s flag should not be waved publicly, especially in international stages.

The 92 Consensus (92 共識), One China? Two Chinas? One China and One Taiwan?

  Let’s deviate from the main issue for a while for a crash course in Taiwan’s history, which indirectly caused the Chou Tzu-Yu incident. (Skip this if you are not interested).

 During the First Sino-Japanese war, Taiwan was ceded to the Japanese Empire under the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895 by the Qing (Manchuria) Dynasty. After that, Dr. Sun Yat-Sen founded the Kuomintang (KMT) and had overthrown the imperialist Qing Dynasty with the cooperation of Communist Party of China (CPC). In 1945, the Japanese was defeated in the World War II and Taiwan was returned to China. However, civil war broke out in China between KMT and CPC right after WWII. KMT under the leadership of Chiang Kai-Shek was forced to retreat to Taiwan in 1949 as their last stronghold against CPC. In the end, KMT stayed on in Taiwan while CPC had founded the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in Mainland China.

  KMT had implemented Republic of China’s constitution in 1946, which that time encompasses both Mainland China and Taiwan. However, after 1949 when KMT was defeated in the mainland, the constitution applies only to Free China, which is the island of Taiwan. Chiang Kai-Shek had not given up in regaining the mainland and so the constitution of Republic of China still applies until now.

  After Chiang Kai-Shek’s death and Taiwan went into democracy eventually in the 1990s, the constitution was amended. In an effort to improve relationships between Taiwan and Mainland China, ministers from both sides met in Hong Kong to discuss about possible futures. In the end, the 92 Consensus (92共識) was formed, and it was the basic principle for Taiwan’s relation with China until now.

  The 92 Consensus states that there is only one China, however it is not clear that how the one China was interpreted, and consensus is not a formal agreement. From PRC’s point of view, there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China along with the Mainland China. From KMT’s point of view, there is only one China, and Taiwan is part of China, but did not state whether the mainland belongs to KMT’s one China. Generally, Taiwanese do not accept this consensus and KMT’s president that time, Lee Teng-Hui, does not admit the existence of this consensus that time. However, in later years, KMT admitted this consensus exists and it had made local born Taiwanese furious, wanting independence of Taiwan from China, and does not want Taiwan to be associated with PRC in any way. However, in order to do that, the constitution of Republic of China which governs Taiwan must be amended.

  During Chen Shui-Bian from Democratic People’s Party (DPP) presidency, he had tried to amend the constitution so that Taiwan will be independent. However, during that time, the Legislative Yuan (The Legislative Assembly in Taiwan) was still controlled by KMT, and thus Chen’s effort failed. This however had caused the rise of pro-independence parties in Taiwan. Of course, there are pro-unification groups that wanted Taiwan to be part of PRC. DPP is considered a pro-independence party, but there their rise only started right now in 2016 when they became the majority of the Legislative Yuan, and they may amend the constitution easily.

  In short, the one China different interpretation had put Taiwan in a delicate position. From PRC’s point of view, Taiwan is part of PRC. From KMT’s point of view, Taiwan is Republic of China. But for many local Taiwanese (those who are not pro-KMT), Taiwan is Taiwan, China is China. Hence the interpretation of 92 Consensus differed from each other, but it is the key that shaped the current Taiwan and PRC relations.

How Chou Tzu-Yu came into the picture?

  TWICE was invited to perform in China by some television stations during Chinese New Year and JYP (which is the talent company/agent for TWICE and Chou Tzu-Yu) agreed to it, the television station had even paid the deposit to JYP for their performance. There was no problem during that time. However, a Taiwanese artist who had went to China for his career named Huang An (黃安) had accused Tzu-Yu of being a pro-independence Taiwanese, because she had waved Taiwanese flag in the promotional video of TWICE. This is not the first time Huang did such things, he had accused several other Taiwanese artists before. Huang An had openly declared that he supports Taiwan but he does not support Taiwan’s independence. In addition, Huang had obtained PRC’s citizenship, making him a citizen of China, making some people said that Huang is a traitor of Taiwan.
  The accusation went viral overnight, and the television stations which invited TWICE believed the accusation. This had also caused some people in China voiced out their dissent and wanted Tzu-Yu to be banned from entering China. The television stations even wanted JYP to remove Tzu-Yu from TWICE if they still want to perform in China (or to put it simply, secure JYP’s market in China), but JYP did not said much about it. When the television station knew about it, they had asked JYP to return the hefty deposit paid but JYP refused immediately, and said that they can send some other groups to perform in place of TWICE but due the television stations refused. The television stations even demanded JYP to apologize publicly. In the end, JYP cannot take the pressure and had forced Tzu-Yu to apologize.

  Tzu-Yu’s apology was recorded and broadcasted like a public humiliation. In addition, the broadcast was less than 12 hours before the presidential and legislative elections in Taiwan (which I am not sure it is a coincidence or conspiracy, as there were cases where major events happened right before major presidential elections in Taiwan). Tzu-Yu’s apology was a scripted one, she apologized to everyone, especially TWICE supporters in China and of course, to JYP. Moreover, she had declared herself as a citizen of PRC. The apology was ISIS styled, in which people are held at gunpoint to apology. JYP had poured some oil into the fire by changing Tzu-Yu’s nationality form Taiwanese to China-Taiwan in their official website. This had caused an uproar in Taiwan, as Tzu-Yu is a pure Taiwanese and was forced to declare herself as a PRC citizen. She gained sympathies from Taiwan and also all over the world, because Tzu-Yu did nothing wrong but she was subjected to public humiliation. From her facial expression in the video, Tzu-Yu was definitely stressed from this issue and she was reluctant to apologize. Furthermore, as a pure Taiwanese being forced to declare herself as PRC citizen, that is a public humiliation. This is why she became an overnight sensation all around the world.

  Compiling the facts of Tzu-Yu’s apology, these are my observations and summary of events. First, Tzu-Yu only held R.O.C.’s flag as Taiwan’s flag in the promotional video of TWICE, as she admits herself as a Taiwanese. Second, she was accused of being a pro-independence Taiwanese by just waving R.O.C.’s flag by Huang An, and subsequently Tzu-Yu was forced by JYP to apologize and declare herself as PRC citizen, which is a public humiliation. Third, JYP forced Tzu-Yu to apologize just to protect their interest in the China market, without considering the feelings of their artist. As an agent, they should protect the artists, not the other way round. Fourth, Taiwanese were angered, especially the youths who are K-Pop fans and are following the progress of TWICE and Zhou Tzu-Yu. This incident had a deep impact in Taiwan, as people all around Taiwan were discussing about it apart from the presidential elections.

The aftermaths of Chou Tzu-Yu’s incident

  Young Taiwanese were at first reluctant to cast their vote for presidential and legislative elections in the 2016 general elections in Taiwan which was at 16th January. This is because the results are very clear and they doubted that their votes will have any effect on the outcome of elections. However, after the Chou Tzu-Yu incident broke out around 10p.m. on 15th January, youths had stood up and said that they will vote even they do not want to. The transportation system on 16th January was full with people who went home to vote, and some even returned from overseas just to vote. The youths voting for this election does not necessarily represent their support to any political parties, it is just an act of protest to Chou Tzu-Yu’s apology, and wanted Taiwan to change, so that Taiwanese who went overseas will not be humiliated anymore. However, the total voter turnout rate for the 2016 general elections was the lowest ever recorded. This indicates that if Chou Tzu-Yu’s incident did not happen, youths will not come out to vote, and may even lower the voter turnout rate.

  Some even credited Chou Tzu-Yu for Tsai Ing-Wen’s win in the presidential elections and the shift of power in the Legislative Yuan. This is because young people had fed up of KMT’s governance and wanted a major change in the government. I personally think it is the ‘anyone but KMT’ concept which drove Tsai and DPP to win, and Chou Tzu-Yu’s incident is a catalyst for this to happen. Zhou Tzu-Yu’s incident had also made Taiwanese and PRC to review their diplomatic history of Taiwan and PRC, wanting to know more why did this happen.

  Huang An on the other hand, did not gain anything from his accusation but instead was criticized from both Taiwan and PRC. Taiwanese had criticized him that as a Taiwanese born artist, he did not protect other Taiwanese but harm them in such way. Many people even wanted the government to ban Huang An from entering Taiwan (he intended to return to Taiwan on February). Moreover, the statement of PRC government states that Huang An’s accusation had caused a drawback in Taiwan and PRC’s relation. This had caused Huang An’s social media platforms to be banned both in Taiwan and PRC, and had caused stress for Huang An.

  JYP had also taken a toll. JYP was not only subjected to criticisms in Taiwan, but in South Korea and overseas as well, especially Japan. JYP’s stock even dropped a lot in the market after the incident. This had caused a mini-crisis to JYP. Some Taiwanese even wanted JYP to break their contract with Tzu-Yu, and a media company is willing to pay for the buyout, so that Tzu-Yu can return to Taiwan and continue her career without subjected to humiliations. Of course, realizing Tzu-Yu’s potential, JYP refused.

  The Chou Tzu-Yu’s incident had caused war of words between netizens in Taiwan and PRC (and overseas as well). Many people think that PRC had forced Tzu-Yu to apologize, and this is an act of bully to a 16-year-old who had nothing to do with politics. Netizens in PRC upheld the 92 Consensus highly as it had been a principal for Taiwan-PRC relations. However, they exerted their dominance by stating that Taiwan is part of China, so Tzu-Yu is a citizen of China, so she should respect PRC. Netizens in Taiwan (especially young people) had retaliated by stating that Taiwan is Taiwan, hence there is nothing wrong by Tzu-Yu to wave Taiwan’s flag as a support to Taiwan. In my opinion, waving Taiwan’s flag is just an act of support to Taiwan, not an act of disrespect to PRC. Moreover, no one can prove Zhou Tzu-Yu does not respect PRC. However, forcing Tzu-Yu to apologize had proved too much for Taiwanese and also the international community. The international media even had coverage on this issue.

Summary


  The Zhou Tzu-Yu incident is what I define as politicization and public bully of an innocent 16-year-old who had nothing to do with politics. A young, pure, cute, and innocent girl was forced to apology and reaffirm her citizenship in a public broadcast was definitely wrong, I am sure she does not know what she did to get her into this position and it is quite sad to see this. I personally felt that there are many things that should be kept out of politics, this is one of the case, why let a 16-year-old carry the burden of country politics? Tzu-Yu just wanted to sing and dance on the stage, so why stop her? In conclusion, Zhou Tzu-Yu’s incident influenced the political landscape in Taiwan, even she does not have anything to do with it. I just hope that she can continue her career free of political influences.

Saturday, December 26, 2015

Reforms, reforms, reforms... (Education)

  I had wondered why the United Examinations Certificate (UEC) of Malaysia shared similarities with Taiwan's secondary school education. Now I know because it was actually based on Taiwan's curriculum in the 1970s. However, what's surprising is that the curriculum had not changed in 40 years (really?). Here is the article which I got the information and wanted to share my opinion on: http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/12/27/dong-zong-pressured-to-reform-curriculum-groups-want-chinese-schools-to-keep-up-with-the-times-with/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter (From The Star Online)

[The one in question, UEC]
  UEC has its own merit compared to public secondary schools in Malaysia. The superiority in mathematics of UEC students is what I looked up upon. Generally speaking, 5-7 years of education in public institutions (SPM and STPM) is definitely incomparable with 6 years in UEC. Usually students graduated from SPM will need extra 1 to 2 years of pre-university courses in order to fully cope with university syllabus, while UEC students does not need to as they had achieved enough within the 6 years.

  However, when I saw that UEC is based on Taiwan's education curriculum in the 1970s, I was prepared to say: "You gotta change it". This is because Taiwanese education that time was a more nationalist based education, the ideas and concepts were not suitable for Malaysians. Emphasis on Chinese history compared to Malaysian history were given even in UEC, causing students not fully understand Malaysia's history while excel in Chinese history. When in Rome, do as the Romans do; it is odd for not studying Malaysian history while in Malaysia. I do study Taiwan's history while I am in Taiwan (and I am still now), for research purposes actually.

  In addition, UEC must adapt to Malaysians society and norms. UEC had failed to gain recognition from Malaysian government because it refused to change its medium into Bahasa Malaysia (Malaysia's national language), causing students graduated from UEC cannot enter public universities and cause long going disgruntles among Malaysian Chinese (and politicized). I think that both sides should practice diplomacy in the recognition of UEC. Malaysian government should allow the medium of instruction to be continued in Chinese and not interfering much in UEC's curriculum system whereas UEC should undergo reforms to adapt their curriculum to Malaysia's system, giving certain priorities in Bahasa Malaysia in the process. Only  when these two parties compromised, UEC can be recognized, allowing high quality students to enter local universities, improving the competitiveness of Malaysian universities.


[The sad case of PPSMI]
  I hailed from one of the best public secondary school in Malaysia (or that's what they claimed), and I was lucky to be in the PPSMI era where English was used for teaching of science and mathematics. I think that  PPSMI is a good system because it had helped me (and I am sure many others as well) adapt to university life (when I was still in Department of Chemistry) easily. I had also gained some upper hand in reading materials in English, which most of my Taiwanese friends failed. However, since PPSMI was a new system during my time, many students who are not familiar with English can't adapt to the teaching. Even the teachers who had taught science and math had a hard time because they were used to teach in Bahasa Malaysia and can't adapt to it. This is quite a sad case because PPSMI was scrapped a few years after I graduated from pre-university as the lack of qualified teachers and the lack of student interest from students had caused it to fail. I think that PPSMI was implemented too soon and hastily, hence causing the whole system to collapes. Every reform takes time, especially in education. If an education system works well and it will help future generations, I think that it should be continued or do prior investments before fully implementing the system.

[Lets talk about Taiwan]
  As mentioned above, Taiwan's education curriculum was more of a nationalist education in 1970s but a lot had changed since then. The so called 'nationalist' education was due to the hope of a certain party to regain China and not focused on Taiwan itself. In addition, Taiwan was under martial law in that time, limiting the freedom of speech, causing people who advocated for a more liberal education to fail. However, many had changed after the martial law was lifted in 1987 and education reforms in Taiwan started in 1990s.

  I am still researching on this topic but apparently the 1990s reform is a failure. In my personal opinion, I think that Taiwan's education had became more liberal but there were too many loopholes. Students were exposed to the world beyond China and globalization had started since then, which is a positive effect. However the education system that time (maybe even now) was a highly exam oriented education, caused students lacking soft skills. Moreover, the examination system in Taiwan is also very complex, especially university entrance exams (from what I know there are two), causing unfairness in university entrance.

  The vice-presidential debate yesterday (26th December 2015) had proved that education is a hot topic. Candidates from different parties had attacked each other over education issues. KMT was blamed for the 22k policy of fresh graduates; Chen from DPP was attacked over the education reform in 1990s as he played some role in it; whereas Hsu from PFP had questioned about quality vs quantity of university graduates. It proved that reforms were needed soon and fast.

[More English please.....]
  The education of English language both in Malaysia and Taiwan is something which I would love to criticize.

  Lets start with Malaysia, my motherland. English is a must pass subject in SPM examinations and it is even a requirement in university entrance in Malaysia. Overall, I think that Malaysians have good English standards but not competitive enough in the world. The case of teaching of English (and teaching some subjects in English) were highly affected by racial ultras who want to protect their own native tongue. They regard their own mother tongue as the most superior and like what I said about, when in Rome do as the Romans do, so you will need to use your own mother tongue in teaching. However, the idea sacrificing global competitiveness for nationalism is not a wise move as communications with the world require a lingua franca, and sometimes our mother tongue is not one of the lingua franca. In addition, when in universities, most high quality reading materials are in English, an early exposure of students to English will allow students to save time for studying or researching. English is also a must when you want your ideas to be presented globally. Hence I do hope that Malaysia will revert back to PPSMI while not sacrificing their mother tongue, which is hard but plausible.

  After living in Taiwan for 4.5 years, I think that Taiwanese had quite a good level of English (which I had always told my Taiwanese friends). From what I heard, English was taught in primary and secondary schools in Taiwan, even in universities (at least in mine), it is a core subject that all students must pass. Furthermore, a proof of English proficiency is needed to graduate from my university. This shows that Taiwan regards the importance of English. However, there are some issues regarding the teaching of English in Taiwan. Taiwanese students study English just for exams and proof of proficiency, not for daily applications. Some of my friends had said that in their high school, they only learn English words by words and all they need to do is to memorize the meanings of those words. This will be good enough for minimum proficiency, I do agree, but to achieve global competitiveness, they must know how to apply it. The lack of application (writing and speaking) had caused Taiwanese university students to suffer from degradation of English in their university time, causing them to struggle when English medium were used in teaching and they need Chinese translated medium to help them. Moreover, some Taiwanese are shy to talk to foreigners in English as they are worried that the words they used are inappropriate or wrong, which is a wrong concern.  This shows that the current method of English teaching is a failed one. I would suggest a more intensive coverage of English for all levels of education institutions in Taiwan.

[Conclusion]
  Reforms in education are quite hard and complex, because it was affected by country politics directly. However, reforms are needed to produce future generations who are competitive domestically and internationally, making their country a better one. I am quite positive that education reforms will happen in Taiwan starting next year, but for UEC it may take time. I also do hope that Malaysia and Taiwan can emphasize on English education as well, for the development of their own country.